HMD Terra M
₱6,999
HMD Terra M vs Lava Yuva Star 3
The Lava Yuva Star 3 wins overall due to its superior battery capacity (2510 mAh vs 5000 mAh) and more RAM (2GB vs 4GB), despite having less storage space.
Winner for most people: Lava Yuva Star 3
- HMD Terra M — 0 wins
- Lava Yuva Star 3 — 5 wins
- 1 tie
✎ Edit or add a device Browse all devices
| Spec | HMD Terra M | Lava Yuva Star 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 2.8" TFT LCD, 550 nits, 480 x 640 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~286 ppi density), Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | 6.75 inches, IPS LCD, 90Hz, 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Processor | Qualcomm Dragonwing QCM2290 (11 nm) Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 702 | IMG8322 |
| RAM | 2GB RAM | 4GB RAM |
| Storage | 32GB | 64GB |
| Main Camera | Main: 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | Selfie: No | 13 MP (wide), AF; 5 MP selfie |
| Battery | Li-Po 2510 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Operating System | Smart OS 14 | Android 15 |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE, GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NFC, USB Type-C with magnetic accessory connector pins | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth 4.2, A2DP, GPS, GLONASS, USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, FM radio |
| Dimensions | 14.5mm thickness | 193.7g, 8.5mm thickness |
| Weight | 210g | 193.7g |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Features | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant, MIL-STD-810H compliant, drop resistant up to 1.8m, dedicated red LED torch, two programmable keys, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, IP64 dust tight and water resistant (water splashes) |
| Price | ₱6,999 | ₱6,999 |
Which should you buy?
Budget-conscious buyers should choose the HMD Terra M, as it offers better value for money with a similar spec set. For power users or those who require more processing power, the Lava Yuva Star 3 is recommended.
Frequently asked questions
Is the HMD Terra M worth it over the Lava Yuva Star 3?
No, the Lava Yuva Star 3 is a better value for money with a longer battery life and more RAM.
Which has the better camera?
The Lava Yuva Star 3 has a superior main camera with higher megapixels and improved optics compared to the HMD Terra M.
Which has the longer battery life?
The Lava Yuva Star 3 outperforms the HMD Terra M with its larger battery capacity, lasting up to 2510 mAh versus 5000 mAh.
Which is better value for money?
The HMD Terra M offers better value for money despite having less RAM and storage space, as it has a longer battery life and slightly more RAM than the Lava Yuva Star 3.
Does the [Device A] have a front-facing camera?
Yes, the HMD Terra M does not have a front-facing camera while the Lava Yuva Star 3 includes one with 5 MP resolution and autofocus capabilities.
Which device is lighter?
The Lava Yuva Star 3 is significantly lighter at 210g compared to the HMD Terra M's 193.7g, making it a more comfortable option for users.